June 28, 2013
When one goes to the satellite TV that are transmitted to here, there is usual and obvious announcement going on in every few minutes such as “this is CNN”, and one of the person whom I shared table in café said, did we say this is BBC or Aljazeera. And one was wondering as to why people or such given institutions say such obvious matter louder is an idea one contemplates on further.
And someone whom I met in past told me something similar aspect in which this was an interview conducted and transmitted by a famous TV station and the journalist ask similar and obvious questions and there was one man who noticed their style and gave them a shock, when they arranged and schedule him to make an interview due to the fact that he assumed that they are not doing their job, since they ask similar questions to everyone they face. And the interviewer asked the guest, who is Mr x, and Mr X replied since he was well prepared, he gave his resume which was like papers in box file to the interviewer.
When institutions develop certain style in their communications and interaction, they should not be considered and prejudged by others in way that their answers and replies are predictable and known ahead or they should not dwell in the idea of being unpredictable by others, losing their steps or limits, shifting to different end with the motive of being unpredictable by others so that what they claim could be proven wrong and they could be found fake and wrong as time passes by.
Any given institution cannot be defined and interpreted as agent of God since it is predictable or unpredictably by others, but this could require different way of understanding. When it becomes predictable, they claim, closer than one’s life vein; when it is not unpredictable, they claim, it is unknowable essence. But both are human way of understanding. Both are human perception than what that real essence is. It is just human method of perceiving God, which s no absolute, free from error and cannot be the way God is since it is very hard to tell about such entity.
When institutions claim authority and power on matters they have no clue, they have underlined assumptions and ideas and they divide and label people on the types of perceptions and understanding they have toward such entity. Categorization and labeling becomes the agenda in here they narrow and limit everything to few circles based on understanding and thinking. Hence, they should be working out in way pertinent to the particular activity and query than categorize and label many aspects under one group which could mislead others and lead them to reach false perceptions and conclude things to wrong end.
Why do certain institutions or individuals use similar fashion or style in which they develop certain brand and they cannot get out of certain fashion or style since they think that they developed certain standards? In the market world a given business flourishes and dies by its brand in which when a given brand is liked, it flourishes; and when given brad is disliked, it is removed. When a certain standard is developed such standards could be the cause of prosperity or failures as well since they do not allow flexibilities. In this case, it suffers since it is not flexible.
Hence many institution suffer it is because they develop their own stuff in their own way and when reality proves them wrong, they face hard time in changing due to the need or the condition and new need arise, and they incur huge costs. They make huge survey and hire consultants and the like and they incur costs, from single penny to billions of dollars or whatever. There are also many unnecessary costs and expenses such give institution incur besides the regular activities they perform. Who is responsible for such loss or cost?
The first responsible body is the institution who initiates such programs without having proper knowledge and awareness. Institution should have better eyes and ears than individuals and when they initiate any given program, its feasibility and existence should be for at least greater that its survey period, than incur costs for a project that can be borne and dead in the middle of the program without getting actualized and translated to objective reality. When any program or project is initiated, it should be with the intention of delivering fruit than getting consumed in the middle of it since it is not realistic and useful.
The second responsible body is the consultants who make such processes continue and stay longer since it is the question of income than reality; when consultants want to make everything delayed, they are elongating their pay period due to the fact that they are paid for the job. They always seek to see things in longer period due the way such surveys and analyses are done in way those people before them used to practice. Even if they did it in faster period, they could not be trusted since it is assumed that enough time was not spent and delivered to arrive at certain point. Such obvious trends such people have come about make any program costs more that it should be.
Taking such given aspects in to account, there is always obvious dramas everywhere in which one is doing a repetition and extension of the other in many institutions and daily routines. Many people get bore it is not because they are boring, but the system designs them to be boring in which a given system does not allow them to do things outside the box or they are not allowed to do their own things which they like since the system says, do not do this or that, it puts threats and prohibitions in what they like, thus they prefer to oppress their feelings and thinking due to fear of consequences. And they look boring to those who enjoy such given system.
For instance, there was an institution which I use to work when I was abroad, they have form letters in which they use similar reply standards although they give answers pertinent to the questions individual and others which they interact and the like. These are, “in reply”, “further to your” and the like, and they also use much of words like “in which”, and the like. But the point is that, they have two type of reply which is detected by the conclusion, in which, if they reply to good ones, they end their letter with words and statement like., “we Pray and the like”; but when they think that one is bad to them, they end their letters when there is communication which they should reply and give answers, with no concluding remarks of such type and they make it very strong and business type. This is one approach.
They forget that none lives by the grace of their prayer and none seeks their help but it was quest and questions one have in which one needs specific answers to the questions one submitted, why did they do that to me [strange shock, giving two lines of telephone in way the rest should stigmatize, depriving one’s allowance at the end of one’s stay, and the like in three different emails to their address] was the question, and they answer, we pray, then behave. The question was crystal clear, the answer is not clear and is not even an opinion, but rather threatening and sabotage and conspiracy on behind. Who is normal or abnormal in world questions are clear, but answers are not even clear and not directly related to the questions.
When institutions answer and reply to communications they receive from various individuals is known ahead of time, they loss respect and it is difficult to give them the right honor they deserve since they become predictable and they tell similar answers to different type of questions. This makes what they do as hoax than an aspect that goes to truth and reality; they are not trusted since what they tell and reply is easily predictable. People lose confidence towards them and people do not give them the necessary reverence they seek. They can trick many people, but one cannot be tricked by them since one lived inside them.